Economy or Economics

To SIN or not to sin?

SIN*:
Switch Topics
Ignore Facts
Name Call

Call it a Wrap?
With no bow on it, or aft?**

* rated X for economiX
(I should note that I was thoroughly entertained by the Fight of the Century, but it is a Koch sponsored production, and requires a fair bit of economics** as well as other disciplines to see that it is more inciteful than insightful. But the other links provide some other perspectives that I only have a hunch are more "fair and balanced" and not in a Faux or FOKS way. I have only begun to unRap them, but there is a pun in the 3 bows.***

** redone duncy Not! (actually this just might be the bow)

*** correction 4 is more on target

[NOTE: Under(see Wrap) and a fair bit of economics and NOT! are the links I have yet to dijest (see sic and pour ridge metaphor)]

Literary Hero Passes

Gore Vidal:  Not that I have heroes,
he was the hero of some friends
and I guess nemesis of the opposition.

Segue*: MSNBC Wrong Knee
PoliticsNation Healthcare for Women
MorningJoe- Poll land for Romney?
TheLastWord LaTourette's Sin Drone
RachelMaddow Women's Healthcare
TheEdShow  Repeal
Hardball International Raw Money
MorningJoe Mitt Clinton


8-2-12 AM1090 Forum:
Norman Goldman & Don Siegelman

MSNBC "take my word 4 it"
Morning Joe: Chicken Fight**
Rachel Maddow Deadly Republicans ***
Politics Nation
& Hard Ball

* Not exactly (less exactly)
** TheLastWord
*** TheEdShow
[investigation]

8-8-12
Guest Book: 
In Memoriam
et al. 
Bah zing uh ?

If Only It Were Black and White.

Now don't read between the lines*.
SIN comes in all peoples. (Shift, Ignore, Name call)

[note: anachronism** and update, labels and links]

* caution language: not rated for sensitive hearts
(not to mention subject matters) Crtl F: "vote"

[Please note this was not meant to be such a challenge. The only thing black and white is a vote, and sometimes even that is questionable. But the underlying current is that the two parties are incomparable, but that does not stop people from choosing tents or not even entering them. The point is, what the "F" are people thinking when they are voting? Well, they may have left their sinking ship of the right and will proceed to dilute and delude the left.]

** not to mention acornyms(sp!): Strength in Numbers? Sea challenge[!]
[There was an embedded point on strength and ** was not it(but there is a hint in the labels or scroll over).]

[I almost inserted an image, but can't find the right place to put it, maybe this is where it fits.]

[Follow up or down. i.e. Bottom links represent actual sequences(hopefully), they have been adjusted for the sake of format.]
[But hold your horses.]

[BTW***: this was not intended as a Halloween special. WC/RC/SC...Warner/Chamblis?]
*** Brian "Tangent" Williams [If only...]

Who Let the Dogs Out?

Original reaction: Not to Second Guess.

This idea coalesced from a Melissa Harris-Perry(*) panel and a Jared Bernstein reaction.
What irritated me was the piling on upon Mitt Romney. The second guessing was how Jared Bernstein discusses the context he was taken out of. As the panel on MH-P continued after her weigh-in on words via Barack Obama the segment on Word Police had nothing to do with my change, but everything to do with it; change and context and victim hoods. Not to mention "quote(s) from Nerdlandia" creeping into the X-change. (The hazzards of live blogging.***) I had no clue in the "footnote" controversy.** Am I falling for the spin, that Raw Money is a victim? Or do I forget my own theory of Share 'n Angle? Not too mention differences of intents[!]
* to be updated
** to be related later[!]
*** the alternative would be more awkward[!]

7-9-12 A Hunch Revisited as Obama prepares* to speak on extending part of Bush tax cuts.
[Segue/break: the "Dogs" above are "aTax dogs"; my subtle skirt of the issue.]

Regarding the president's speech, here are my rough notes:  Jobs.. core mission... rebuilding economy...stalemate...choice two views.  Top down- wrong...typical middle class tax cuts $3600... repeat $3600 Obama midle class tax cuts... for sake of misinformation.  We tried, slowest job growth, falling income, rising deficits... we can't afford more.  [me: we 1/2 tried more or other way].  People are with him, cut small business taxes 18 times, for 97% of them.  We should agree to do what we agree on!  [poor 1%, 2% 3%]  One year extention for under $250K then we can debate the rest and act or wait till after the election.  You are the ones driving the economy.  Learn lessons of the past, build foundation for the future.

* speech here[Note that links for "A Hunch Revisited" were contemporary, not later insertions. Referencing democracy and choices of direction.]

[Andrea Mitchell follow-up here: "fiscal cliff"?** and tug of misinfo!  Deficit distraction or key?]

[Bingo was his dog!  NewsNation "big tent" not to mention simple math from idiots.  I'm sorry, but math is where the numbers lie.  It is math warfare.  But I digress. Well,* not exactly ! ** And pardon my pun but Swiss Romney Knife?]

** bit of a cycle/anachronism here*** regarding insertion of links & today's asterisks.(I may not have the right fiscal cliff clip but neither does the math add up for AM or RNC. Re:Bingo and math of the dog carrier or station waggin')

*** (rather here **) HW B? (SK re/v SE: 5:25 HW Harvy Weinstein)

[OW to Act?]
[Bingo too point OH! (see poor 1%, 2%, 3%: LR RL)]
(Anachronistically where does MB fit in here ? i.e. I can' remember where Luke Russert was nailed down.  But I think it was Martin Bashir who was asking about the 1, 2 or 3% and the previous sequence w/links does hit the nail on the understanding or aTAX jobs.)
[Hardball: David Corn to Smerconish "Sin of making sense". Then Bob's your uncle. It certainly rots at the head. MM Marshalling Message ?]

Hyper Sorting

The "Liberal Media" is Laughable...
Update
If Only It were Black and White
Axis of Fruit Loops
These links reflect the actual sequence of the last four posts.

The "Liberal Media" is Laughable...
Meet the Press from the week before featured Ron Paul(14 minutes in),
"undoubtably" the scariest thing for Herman Cain.
Then I feature Norman Goldman* "on the other hand"
Followed by two takes on the OWS crowd.

Update
Rovian Republican Recalcitrance(theory)
Attack Strength
SIN
and Spin on the Simpson-Bowles*** and the NRA**.

Axis of Fruit Loops
Martin Bashir on Koch/Cain and Mika Brzezinski on Elizabeth Warren on Morning Joe
* adding 10-31-11
** need Martin Bashir
*** Morning Joe?

[MB- McDermott on debt plans and super committee
Smoked Cheese, etc.]

Hi tech whining. [10-4-11 Republicans Crack Me Up]

Let those without irony

read without whining.

Let those without hyperbole...

Tapper Guiliani

This childishness seems the inverse of logic.
Let those without sin cast the first stone?
How many points are in this bag of stones.

Assuming a stone is for throwing, and there is an unnamed target, it is the who and the order that might be significant.
without /first
10/10/16

Pardon my lack of follow-up.

Anti-semantics or...**

Parsing Semitics.
        -  /  -


Anti-Semantics.*


A. Not In My Name: Some Facebook funny-business brought the first link to my attention.
B. Facebook Empathy the 2nd insert.
C. True Torah expressions.
D. Not In My Name but whose?
-/-

* See D irony?
---


Kant we all get along without going to Hegel, or without Hume or Mill?
Thesis/Anti-Thesis/Sin-Thesis?***
---


** Work in Progress!  But before I get too fractal or tangent shall, the terminology is pertinent, what is the difference between insurgents and rhetorical terrorists?  They certainly Rn't strategic terrorists[?]  ALSO: Caution with the reading of semantics and semitics[!].  Rhetorically, why is anti-semitic a word while semitics a questionable word?  Could it be in the parsing of semitics?  Pardon the Escher-risks.
...


*** Not to Escher the Charlotte.[link is late insert not fully read]

The Interview

Strongly Parsed:- (President Obama's final comment on 60 Minutes)

And I think that anyone who would question that the perpetrator of mass murder on American soil didn't deserve what he got needs to have their head examined.

I could not parse more, nor do I imply con text. I mean that we can take this sentence as context enough(and with which I agree), yet we can and should question other's parsing and context for justice. [Pour Ridge Metaphor]

Updates: Head Fake or Syntax? Or childish banter. SIN: Shift, Ignore and Name call?

I wouldn't go that far.

On the verge of declaring that the CNBC motto should be Lean BackWords, (I did use the term Fauxword), it is interesting how the words(** )play out.
[AM OC "DNC Uses Dressage Horse to Hit Romney on Tax Returns." Hiding behind the skirt of the issues.  Jeb Bush continues the Lyin' Eyesin'.]
But how far should one go? Not* that I was starting from there.**

*the Jansing&Co links aren't there yet
** Oops maybe I was.
(Note anachronism of asterisks-adjusted.)

[Here is where it started and how far will it go? See AM above.]
[This post needs some serious footnoting***. Re: Labels.]

*** V-8?  [under RNP (viii) links are being sourced re: labels and oops, I have a heckuva lot under construction.]

[Post Roman numerals is The Cycle & "It Takes a Village", and understanding(Bane) more than exceptionalism. Mean while... speaking of Hoover. (para-phrasing meta-ramble)The former president on Fame & Power, a puppet in the headlights or swamp gas? Blast from the past, MED or Axis of Awesome, Reign on Parade of Rove 'n Nordquist.  Hal-C-on days?]

[Re:NorMan GoldMan Show (my)comment below, oops, maybe it is hyper-bully?  Speaking of shows, a technical glitch makes his first hour a veil able. (Featuring Third Party candidate and Morman on Romney. Speaking of dissin'genius.]

PERSPECTIVE

[Posted 12-13-11]

ISM
and back again.
Ctrl F. SIN
Switch
Ignore
Name Call
Or head in the clouds or soul project.